SOFTWARE DELIVERY AND CI/CD

Why are your CI builds still waiting on the network?

Your pipeline shouldn't wait for the internet. Every second a build runner spends pulling a dependency it already pulled is a second your engineers aren't shipping.

Modern software delivery runs at machine speed. Automation loops, auto-scaling runners, and AI agents pull dependencies continuously across hundreds of concurrent builds. The registries behind them weren't designed for this. When Artifactory or Nexus struggles under load, your delivery pipeline waits.

Talk to an Expert

Hero Monitors Blto5rry

The trend making this worse

CI/CD concurrency is accelerating faster than registry infrastructure can absorb. Three forces are driving it:

AI-assisted development

Commit frequency is rising fast. More commits mean more pipeline triggers, more parallel builds, more dependency pulls — all hitting the same upstream registries simultaneously.

Auto-scaling build infrastructure

Peak load is no longer predictable. A single merge to main can spin up dozens of runners in seconds, each independently requesting the same packages from the same origin.

Multi-ecosystem pipelines

Pulling from Docker, npm, PyPI, Maven, and proprietary registries in the same build multiplies upstream calls per run. Every ecosystem is a potential point of failure.

The result is a delivery infrastructure that becomes less reliable as your engineering team grows.

What slow pipelines actually cost

The impact lands differently depending on where you sit:

VP of Engineering

Every hour lost to pipeline latency is an hour not spent shipping features or fixing bugs.

DevOps and SRE lead

A surge of parallel builds during a major release becomes an outage at exactly the moment you can least afford one.

Platform Engineering Director

Delivery SLAs become impossible to guarantee when machine-to-machine traffic can outpace registry capacity at any moment. 

Why standard caches don't fix this

Dropping a generic proxy in front of your registry seems like the obvious answer. It doesn't work, for four reasons specific to how artifact registries operate:

 

 Challenge 1

They compromise security boundaries

Generic proxies cache globally without verifying permissions per request, potentially exposing private artifacts to unauthorized users.

 Challenge 2

Heavy content bypasses the cache entirely

Registries serve large binaries via 302 storage redirects. Standard proxies follow the pointer and pass it to the client, the actual payload never gets cached, so every build runner fetches it directly from cloud storage.

 Challenge 3

Signed URLs drop hit rates

Every storage redirect carries a unique expiring signature token. A conventional cache treats each tokenized URL as a new request, fragmenting the cache map and producing hit rates too low to matter.

 Challenge 4

Metadata conflicts freeze pipelines

The same container layer pulled from two different repositories looks like two different objects to a URL-keyed cache. Storage fills up with duplicates and the deduplication benefit disappears.

"Varnish is the cornerstone of how we handle scale"

Quote

Global streaming service

How Varnish Virtual Registry solves it

Varnish Virtual Registry is a registry-aware caching, routing, and observability layer purpose-built for high-volume software delivery. It sits between your build nodes and your master repositories, acting as a vendor-neutral buffer that handles the read path at memory speed.

01

Build runners never touch the upstream

Artifacts are served from local cache the moment they've been pulled once. Subsequent requests — from any runner, any ecosystem, any team — are answered locally. Upstream registries see a fraction of their previous traffic.

02

Private repositories stay private

Every request is validated against the upstream registry before anything is served from cache. Access controls are enforced per request, not bypassed by caching. Private artifacts are never exposed to unauthorized users.

03

Binary payloads are captured at the perimeter

Storage redirects are resolved server-side. The raw binary bytes are ingested and stored locally, with signature tokens stripped before caching. The same asset is served from local cache on every subsequent request, sustaining 99%+ hit rates from your local network.

04

One control plane across every ecosystem

Docker, npm, PyPI, and Maven consolidate under a single caching and routing layer. Health probes monitor upstream registries continuously and reroute traffic to mirrors or local failover caches during outages. Builds keep running even when upstream services go down.

Varnish Virtual Registry

The numbers

Build concurrency scales. Pipelines stop failing. Engineers stop waiting.

90%+

Reduced backend repo traffic

70%+

Reduced Git requests

40%+

Faster dependency resolution

Talk to our team

Built for pipelines that can't afford to wait

 

Varnish Virtual Registry

Varnish Virtual Registry

A registry-aware caching, routing, and observability layer engineered for high-volume software delivery pipelines. Vendor-neutral, protocol-aware, and designed to sit transparently in front of your existing infrastructure. No rearchitecting your stack. No changing how your teams work. No waiting on the network.

Learn more

Resources and media

Next steps

 

Talk to our team to learn more about Varnish Virtual Registry or try it for yourself for free today.

Request a free trial